خلاصه ماشینی:
"The present system of government in the Islamic Republic of Iran as both a semi-parliamentary and semi-presidential system which started to work after the revision of the Constitution in 1368, like any other existing governmental structures, has revealed its points of weakness and strength since it was established about three decades ago.
In order to identify and explain all possible aspects of legal responsibilities towards the organizational behaviors of the agents, the present article studies the jurisprudential theories and their underlying principles drawing upon analytical-descriptive method.
The article seeks to provide an answer to these two questions and explain the legal responsibilities of agents from various angles such as preserving the divine trust, qualification for taking charge of positions, meeting governmental purposes and serving the interests of the government, claiming responsibility for the consequences of behaviors, collective responsibility, obedience to the Islamic ruler, and preserving public treasury.
( General Positions as a Trust in the System of Constitutional Law of Iran with the Emphasis on the ‛Alawid Thought ( by Sayyid Ahmad Habibnejād and Zahrāʼ ‛āmerī To create systems in the realm of governmental jurisprudence, one first has to deduce the principles and rules from the Islamic jurisprudential heritage and then to construct them within the framework of a legal system.
Drawing upon the analytic-descriptive method along with textual method, the research work seeks to establish the idea that the nature of general positions is based on a trust and one should expand the scope of trust in the realm of individual (personal) jurisprudence to include social and governmental jurisprudence."