چکیده:
امروزه پراکندهکاری و عدم تمحض پژوهشگران بر قلمرو موضوعی محدَّد و محدود در پژوهشهای علوم انسانی، از جمله کاستیها و کژیهای بنیادین این حوزة معرفتی است. بر این اساس مسئله مقاله حاضر عبارت از تعریف و تبیین راهبرد تخصصیسازی پژوهش (تخصصگرایی تمحضمحور) در عرصه علوم انسانی و فرایند اجرای آن است. در این مقاله ابتدا واکاوی پیشینه پژوهش حاضر در ایران و جهان با مراجعه به ادبیات علمی مربوط صورت بسته و بیان دستاوردهای مشخص آن، مرحله بعدی را تشکیل داده است. همچنین ضمن تعریف مفاهیم مرتبط با پژوهش حاضر و بیان چهارچوب نظری آن از جهت غایت و روش، توضیح داده شده است که چرا راهبرد تمحضگرایی در پژوهشهای علوم انسانی به گونهای که مقالة حاضر به تبیین آن پرداخته، دارای اهمیت و ضرورت است. در ادامه به بررسی و تحلیل مفاد مقاله از جهات مختلف پرداخته، نهایتاً الگویی بومی از برنامه تمحضمحوری و تخصصگرایی پژوهش به دست داده شده است. روش پژوهش حاضر از جهت ماهوی، نظری- تجربی و از جهت گردآوری دادهها، کتابخانهای است. این تحقیق را میتوان فشردة نظریه و نظام پژوهشیای قلمداد کرد که مبتنی بر انگارهای خاص به نام «تخصصگرایی تمحضمحور» در فلسفة پژوهش است.
Introduction: Nowadays, the scattering and non-spaciality of
researchers in the field of limited and certain subject matter in the
humanities researchs is one of the fundamental shortcomings and
distortions of this field of knowledge. This problem causes the loss
and low return of human and material capital and also causes the loss
of opportunity. Accordingly, the issue of the present article is to
define and explain the strategy of specialism and subspacialism of
research in the field of humanities and its implementation process.
This article can be considered as a compact theory and research
system that is based on a special idea called “The Subspacial-oriented
Specialism” in the philosophy of research.
Method of Study: The method of the present research in terms of
quiddity is theoretical-experimental and in terms of data collection is
library. Also, important scientific records and documents (including
theoretical foundations and their results) and some actions taken and
necessary experiences (including expertism, design and
implementation) of various research programs, as needed, have been
Findings: The strategy of specialism of research in humanities is a
solution to solve the problem of dispersal and non-speciality of
researchs in the field of humanities in our country. In this article, first,
the analysis of the background of the present research in Iran and the
world by referring to the relevant scientific literature, and then
expression of its specific achievements, have been carried out. Also,
while defining the concepts related to the present research and
expressing its theoretical framework in terms of purpose and method,
it is explained why the strategy of subspacial-oriented specialism in
humanities researchs, as explained in the present article, is important
and necessary. In the following, the contents of the article have been
studied and analyzed from different angles.
Conclusion: In addition to the theoretical results of the present
article, the practical result of the article is to propose a native model of
the program of subspacial-oriented specialism in research with
necessary actions, as follows: 1. Development of the method of
specialism of research in the humanities as a system of knowledge
production in this field; 2. Justifying and learning of the above method
for research policy makers in research and educational institutions and
research influencers; 3. Forming subspacialist research teams and
appointing a mentor for nurturing researchers to conduct the pilot; 4.
Configuration (formulation) of the subspacialist fields in each of the
humanities disciplines; 5. Investing a central researcher for the
subspacialist fields; and 6. Creating a specialized network by defining
research team programs to motivate and direct the research.